• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Who Knew SCA is Spelled DOL Rather than GAO

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • April 18, 2022
  • Ambiguity in SolicitationScope of GAO Review
  • 0 Comments

Matter of Shamrock Marine Towing & Salvage

Decided: December 27, 2021

Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Disposition: Protest Denied

Keywords: Ambiguity in Solicitation, Services Contract Act; Scope of GAO Review

 

Protest Insight

This protest is notable because it showcases that GAO holds a limited scope of authority.  GAO ultimately declined to consider the issue of potential conflicts with the Services Contract Act (SCA), finding that the Department of Labor (DOL) is statutorily charged with interpreting and administering the SCA, and the contracting agency must follow the DOL’s views on the applicability of the SCA unless they are clearly contrary to law.  Additionally, GAO provides guidance on protests involving ambiguity in solicitations and given agencies considerable deference on what is objectively confusing information within a solicitation.

While government contractors cannot avoid all risk, they can choose a legal counsel with experience and insight to mitigate their bid protest risks.  General Counsel, P.C. has the experience and drive to assist clients with assessing award decisions, developing legal courses of action, filing either as an unsuccessful bid protestor or the awardee intervenor, litigating the protest, and developing post-decision lessons learned for more effective future business development practices.

Summary of Facts

Shamrock Marine Towing & Salvage protests the terms of request for quotations (RFQ) No. 70Z08421QBB109300, issued by the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard, for services to support its aviation training program. On April 27, 2021, the agency issued the solicitation as a combined synopsis/solicitation pursuant to FAR part 12 (acquisition of commercial items) and subpart 13.5 (simplified procedures for certain commercial items).

The solicitation provides for award on a lowest-price, technically acceptable basis, considering technical capability and understanding, past performance, and price. The solicitation requires offerors to provide “a unit price for all items” noting: “The unit price for this requirement shall only include the cost for a standard training block. The standard training block will be ONE (1) hour of contract vessel on scene time, not transit time to/from the training site from the contractor’s mooring/docking location.”

Since the solicitation contemplates the award of a services contract, it is subject to the labor standards set forth in the Services Contract Act (SCA) and incorporates the Department of Labor’s (DOL) SCA wage determination 2015-0213, which “sets forth the minimum monetary wages and fringe benefits that must be paid to covered service employees employed on a SCA-covered contract involving tugboats and other coastal vessels.”  The agency sought an advisory opinion from the DOL on the applicability of the SCA to this procurement.  The DOL “concluded that it is consistent with [the wage determination] and with the SCA’s requirements to convert the daily rates listed on [the wage determination] to hourly rates,” explaining: “ Employees must be paid for all hours worked.  The hours worked which are subject to the compensation provisions of the SCA are those in which the employee is engaged in performing work on contracts subject to the SCA, including any time the employee is ‘engaged to wait.’”

The agency received proposals from Management Marine Service Inc. and Shamrock. That same day, prior to the close of business, Shamrock filed this protest.

Basis of Protest

Shamrock argues that the solicitation is unclear, prevents offerors from competing on an equal basis, and conflicts with the SCA. Specifically, Shamrock challenges the terms of the solicitation with respect to the pricing structure and applicability of the SCA.

Protest Sustained

GAO stated that a contracting agency must provide offerors with sufficient detail in a solicitation to enable them to compete intelligently and on a relatively equal basis. However, “there is no legal requirement that a competition be based on specifications drafted in such detail as to eliminate completely any risk for the contractor or that the procuring agency remove all uncertainty from the mind of every prospective bidder.” GAO explained that “risk is inherent in most types of contracts, especially fixed-price contracts, and firms are expected to allow for that risk, and use their professional expertise and business judgment, in preparing their proposals.”

GAO found that, here, the solicitation provided “sufficiently detailed information to allow offerors to compete intelligently and on a relatively equal basis.” The solicitation provided instructions and examples, specifying that unit prices are to be based on “contract vessel on scene time, not transit time to/from the training site.” The agency also responded to Shamrock’s questions, reiterating that “you would pay the people for the time they worked on scene.”

Shamrock further argues that the phrase “engaged to wait,” in the DOL letter, means that the solicitation should be interpreted to allow for pricing other than “contract vessel on scene time.” Shamrock claims that it has “dedicated a single vessel to perform work for this procurement” so it “must pay SCA wages to its personnel during travel times.” However, GAO also pointed out that “there is no requirement that an agency equalize a competitive advantage or disadvantage an offeror may experience because of its own particular business circumstances, where, as here, that disadvantage does not result from a preference or unfair action by the government.”

While Shamrock argues that the solicitation conflicts with the DOL letter regarding the SCA and the applicable wage determination, GAO concluded that “Shamrock has not established that the terms of the solicitation are contrary to applicable procurement law or regulation.” Shamrock argues that GAO should consider “whether the waiting time is spent predominantly for the employer’s benefit or for the employee’s [benefit].” However, GAO stated that the DOL, not GAO, is statutorily charged with interpreting and administering the SCA, and the contracting agency must follow the DOL’s views on the applicability of the SCA unless they are clearly contrary to law. Thus, GAO declined to further consider this issue. GAO denied the protest.

Our Government Contracts Practice Group has extensive experience in government contract law, helping clients solve their government contract problems relating to the award or performance of a federal government contract, including bid protests, contract claims, small business concerns, and teaming and subcontractor relations. If you need more guidance or information, contact Craig Lawless, Senior Counsel in our Government Contracts practice area at General Counsel, P.C., 703-266-1865.

Share

Related Posts

Agency Arguing the Futile in Pre-Award Bid Protest

November 17, 2022

Matter of: M.R. Pittman Group, LLC

May 27, 2021

Matter of AVER, LLC

March 9, 2021

Katmai Information Technologies, LLC, B-406885, September 20, 2012

October 24, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Facility Clearance
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • Impaired Objectivity
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursed Attorney's Fees
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-703-556-0411
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2023 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411