• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

TriCenturion, Inc.; SafeGuard Services, LLC, B-406032, B-406032.2, B-406032.3, B-406032.4, January 25, 2012

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • February 22, 2012
  • Cost RealismOrganizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)Past PerformanceTechnical EvaluationTerms of the Solicitation

Link: GAO Decision

Protestors: TriCenturion, Inc.; SafeGuard Services, LLC

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Disposition: Protest Sustained in part, Denied in part.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

GAO Digest:

1. Challenge to the cost realism evaluation of the awardee’s proposed labor costs is sustained where the record does not demonstrate that the agency’s evaluation was reasonable.

2. Challenge to the evaluation of a protester’s technical evaluation is sustained where the agency does not meaningfully respond to the majority of the protester’s arguments.

3. Challenge to the evaluation of the awardee’s past performance is sustained where the record provided by the agency does not explain how it evaluated the relevance of offerors’ past performance, or whether its proposed subcontractors merited consideration under the terms of the solicitation.

4. Protest that the award was tainted by organizational conflicts of interest is denied where the record shows that the agency reasonably concluded that the potential areas of concern were adequately mitigated.

 General Counsel P.C. Highlight:

TriCenturion, Inc. and SafeGuard Services, LLC (SGS) protested the award of a contract to Cahaba Safeguard Administrators, LLC for zone program integrity contractor (ZPIC) services.

Both protestors argued that the agency’s evaluation of the offerors’ cost and technical proposals, including past performance, was flawed. TriCenturion also argued that the agency failed to conduct meaningful discussions, and both protestors argue that the agency failed to reasonably evaluate organizational conflicts of interest (OCIs) arising from the award to Cahaba.

The GAO first sustained the protestors’ allegations that the agency improperly evaluated Cahaba’s proposed full-time equivalents (FTEs), noting that, although the agency expressed concerns that Cahaba’s proposed FTEs were understated/low, the contemporaneous record and hearing testimony did not reflect how the agency determined that the FTEs may be too low or why the agency determined the FTEs were realistic. The GAO then dismissed complaints about the evaluation of Cahaba’s ODCs and indirect costs, finding the contracting officer’s understanding of Cahaba’s accounting practices to be reasonable, as well as complaints that the protestors’ proposed costs should have been adjusted downward. It sustained SGS’s complaint that the technical evaluation of its proposal was unreasonable, finding the agency’s failure to respond to the majority of SGS’s complaint to constitute an admission. It finally also sustained the protestors’ complaints as to the evaluations of their past performances, again finding the record inadequate to conclude that the evaluations were reasonable.

The GAO dismissed TriCenturion’s complaint that the agency failed to provide an opportunity for meaningful discussions, noting that the issues in question were “minor weaknesses” that did not require discussions. It then dismissed the protestors’ complaint that the award to Cahaba was tainted by OCIs arising from its status as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Alabama (BCBSAL). It noted that the agency had properly investigated the possibility of OCIs, and that Cahaba had provided an OCI mitigation plan with specific details and milestones. Based on its conclusions regarding the unreasonableness of the agency’s evaluations regarding cost, technical and past performance proposals, the GAO recommended that the agency reevaluate the proposals, conduct discussions, and make a new selection decision.

Unsuccessful offerors should request a debriefing to better understand how the agency reached its selection decision. Where the agency fails to maintain adequate documentation of the reasoning behind its decisions, unsuccessful offerors may have an avenue for protest. Additionally, all offerors should pay close attention to any contractual relationships that may give rise to OCIs in future procurements. While constant vigilance may allow an offeror to prevent OCIs from occurring in the first place, a well-drafted and detailed mitigation plan can help an offeror with possible OCIs succeed in the bidding process.

Share

Related Posts

Please, Make My Bid Protesting Day by Not Documenting Your Award Decision.

November 17, 2022

Agency Arguing the Futile in Pre-Award Bid Protest

November 17, 2022

Open Sesame! Ya Gotta Get the Agency Report and Records.

October 24, 2022

So… Do Ya Still Think “Different Size / Scope” Argument works for Impaired Objectivity OCI?

September 29, 2022

Comments are closed

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Facility Clearance
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • Impaired Objectivity
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursed Attorney's Fees
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-703-556-0411
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2023 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411