• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Qwest Government Services, Inc., B-405425, B-405425.3, December 9, 2011

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • August 8, 2012
  • Proposal EvaluationTimeliness of Protest

Link: GAO Decision

Protestor: Qwest Government Services, Inc.

Agency: Department of the Interior

Disposition: Protest Denied.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

GAO Digest:

  1. Agency’s assessment of risk in the protester’s price proposal was reasonable where the protester based its price on assumptions that were not stated in the solicitation.
  2. Protest challenging the evaluation of the protester’s technical proposal is denied where the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation.
  3. Protest that the awardee failed to include required information in a specific part of its proposal is denied, where the record shows that the solicitation was patently ambiguous as to where the information could be provided and the awardee included the information in a different part of its proposal.

General Counsel PC Highlight:

Qwest Government Services, Inc. protested the issuance to Verizon Business Systems of a task order for telecommunications services. The RFP was issued to holders of the GSA’s Networx ID/IQ contract, and informed vendors that they would be evaluated on the basis of price and the following non-price factors, in descending order of importance: (1) transition approach and schedule; (2) quality of technical approach; (3) management and operations; and (4) experience and past performance. The technical factors were more important than price for purposes of award. Although Verizon did not offer the lowest price, the CO selected Verizon for award without performing a price-technical tradeoff in light of Verizon’s “exceptional understanding of the requirements” and the risks posed by the other offerors’ quotations. Qwest protested the initial award, in response to which the agency took corrective action by making a new source selection decision. This protest followed a second award to Verizon.

The GAO first denied Qwest’s objection to its rating of Marginal under the price evaluation factor. The GAO pointed out that the agency identified risks because Qwest’s proposed price for the Incident Response Service (INRS) was significantly lower than the IGCE, and identified a weakness because Qwest’s proposed price for the managed network services (MNS) was lower than the IGCE. The GAO found the agency’s conclusion that Qwest proposed a price risk to be reasonable, noting that Qwest’s quotation was based on fewer circuits than might be required by the agency but expressly warned the agency that it would seek additional payment if additional circuits were required.

The GAO then rejected Qwest’s arguments regarding its technical evaluation. The GAO found reasonable the risk assigned to Qwest’s quotation for having the Computer incident Response Capability (CIRC) not be located at the agency’s Advanced Security Operations Center (ASOC), on the grounds that the security manager Qwest proposed would not be able to provide the required oversight of the CIRC function at the ASOC. The GAO also found no reason to question the risk assigned for failing to describe the feedback or communications with the agency in Qwest’s communication plan. The agency’s assignment of both a strength and a countervailing weakness for Qwest’s use of a single equipment vendor was also reasonable.

Qwest then argued that Verizon had omitted a mandatory table from its pricing proposal, which Qwest asserted rendered Verizon’s quotation unacceptable. The GAO concluded that the RFP was patently ambiguous about where this information could be included, and that Verizon was reasonable in providing information from Table L-3, SEDs Suites Mapping, in Verizon’s bid model. To the extent that Qwest believed that vendors should have been required to provide the information in Table L-3 within the 25 page limit of the price narrative, the GAO held that the challenge was to the terms of the solicitation and was therefore untimely. The GAO also held untimely Qwest’s claims that the agency improperly credited Verizon with strengths that arose from Verizon’s performance of the incumbent task order, and that Verizon had access to information through its incumbent performance that was not available to Qwest, noting that these arguments were raised in Qwest’s response to the agency’s supplemental report but were based on documents made available before the supplemental report.

Vendors bear the burden of submitting adequately written quotations that address all the requirements in the solicitation. If there is any ambiguity in the solicitation regarding the proper formatting of quotations, a vendor must protest the terms of the solicitation prior to the deadline to submit quotes. Failure to do so will prevent a disappointed vendor from protesting an agency’s acceptance of the awardee’s quotation in a format that the disappointed vendor believed was not in accordance with the solicitation.

Share

Related Posts

Matter of Science Applications International Corporation

February 28, 2022

Matter of Allosense, Inc.

February 7, 2022

Matter of WRG Fire Training Simulation Systems, Inc.

January 12, 2022

Matter of: M.R. Pittman Group, LLC

May 27, 2021

Comments are closed

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Facility Clearance
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • Impaired Objectivity
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursed Attorney's Fees
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-703-556-0411
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2023 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411