• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Matter of PennaGroup, LLC

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • October 13, 2017
  • Timely Filing
  • 0 Comments

Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Disposition: Protest Dismissed

Decided: August 25, 2017

Keywords: Timely Filing

General Counsel P.C. Highlight:

GAO deadlines for filings are strict, and the rules for extensions are clear.  Failure to comply with filing deadlines and extension request rules will result in the dismissal of a protest, without consideration of the validity of the protest.

Summary of Facts Leading to Protest

In March of 2017, the Government issued two Requests for Proposals (RFPs).  The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) U.S. Customs and Border Protection sought bids for border wall prototypes.  The Government sought prototypes for the design and construction of both solid concrete border wall prototypes and other than solid concrete border wall prototypes.  Both RFPs were issued under Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart 36.3, which calls for a two-phase design-build approach.   In phase I, the government intended to determine, based on an evaluation, whether any given offeror would be allowed to participate in the second phase of the procurement.

The RFP had amendments, and the original RFPs instructions included a requirement that offerors acknowledge any amendments by signing a Standard Form 30 (SF 30).  Each SF – 30 was to accompany the offeror’s proposal.  The RFP specifically instructed offerors, “failure to acknowledge all Amendments issued by the Government may result in the proposal submitted in response to the solicitation being found non-responsive by the Government.”  Seven amendments were issued to the solicitation.

PennaGroup submitted timely proposals to each of the two solicitations.  However, each proposal was submitted with only an SF – 30 acknowledging the seventh amendment.  No acknowledgement for amendments one through six was included with either proposal.  The agency determined the failure to submit seven acknowledgements rendered PennaGroup’s proposals as “non-compliant.”  Consequently, they were eliminated from further competition.  PennaGroup filed a protest with the General Accounting Office (GAO).

Summary of Facts Post Protest Filing

After the protest was filed, the GAO issued development letters to both parties, dated June 29, 2017, outlining the due dates for relevant actions including the following:

  • Agency report and response to protest due July 26, 2017;
  • PennaGroup’s written comments in response to the report due 10 calendar days after receipt of the report.

PennaGroup and the Government were advised in the letter failure to respond to the agency report within the timeframe would result in the dismissal of the protest.

The agency filed agency reports on July 26, 2017.  These reports were acknowledged by PennaGroup in an email that same day.  PennaGroup’s comments were due August 7, 2917 by close of business.  PennaGroup did not file a response on August 7, and, as such, the GAO contacted PennaGroup to confirm this failure.  PennaGroup responded “our legal team has reviewed the agency’s response and finds no new legal or factual arguments not fully set forth in length in our original Bid Protest.”  This response was provided on August 8, 2017.

On August 9, 2017, DHS filed a request for dismissal in light of PennaGroup’s failure to file comments as directed.  PennaGroup responded at that time they would have filed comments in a timely fashion but for technical difficulties attributable to internet service disruption due to inclement weather which prevented the filing.  PennaGroup also indicated they attempted to contact GAO attorneys regarding the late filing.

Protest Dismissed

The GAO notes bid protests are serious matters.  Procedures are in place to assure both parties the fair opportunity to present their case.  Procedures also ensure resolution in a reasonably speedy manner.  Filing deadlines are designed to assist in speedy resolution.  The rules mandate failure to file comments within 10 calendar days “shall” result in dismissal unless one of two conditions has been met. First, where the GAO has previously granted an extension, the response may be filed later.  Second, where the GAO has established a shorter period for response, the shorter period applies.  Due to PennaGroup’s failure to timely file a response or request an extension, dismissal is the appropriate result.

The GAO further notes PennaGroup requested an extension of time to file comments after the original deadline.  Bid Protest Regulations, however, do not allow for post-deadline extensions.  Without a request for extension prior to the original due date of close of business August 7, no extension can be granted, regardless of the reason for the failure to file in a timely fashion.

Protests dismissed.

 

 

Share

Related Posts

Matter of: Equitus Corporation

July 22, 2021

Timely Filing in the Matter of: SageCare, Inc.; AeroSage, LLC

August 14, 2017

Baldt Inc., B-402596.3, June 10, 2010

June 17, 2010

Latvian Connection Trading and Construction, LLC, B-402410, February 25, 2010

March 4, 2010

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-571-223-6845
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2022 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845