• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Matter of Spry Methods, Inc.—Reimbursement of Protest Costs

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • March 23, 2020
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs

Agency: Department of Interior
Disposition: Request for Costs Granted
Decided: February 14, 2020
Keywords: Reimbursement of Protest Costs
General Counsel P.C. Highlight: If the agency delays taking corrective action in the face of a clearly meritorious protest, causing the protester to make further use of the protest process in order to obtain relief, GAO may recommend reimbursement of protest costs; even if the agency eventually takes corrective action.

Summary of Facts

Spry Methods, Inc. requests that GAO recommend that it be reimbursed the costs of filing and pursuing its protest challenging the issuance of a task order to Customer Value Partners, Inc. (CVP) under RFQ No. 140D0419Q0011, issued by the Department of the Interior (DOI)
for information management and assurance program support services.

The RFQ was first issued on October 15, 2018 and established that the task order award would be made on a best-value tradeoff basis between the equal evaluation factors of technical approach and price. Twenty vendors, including Spry and CVP, submitted quotations. On April 18, the contracting officer notified CVP of weaknesses in its proposal and offering CVP an opportunity to submit a revised technical quote. CVP revised its response to address the identified weaknesses. No other vendor was contacted or allowed to submit a revised quotation. CVP was awarded the task order, and Spry filed a protest.

On August 29, DOI filed its agency report and argued that the evaluation of vendors’ quotations and resulting award decision was reasonable and consistent with the stated evaluation criteria. On September 9, Spry filed its comments on the agency report. On October 9, DOI submitted a letter to GAO, stating that after reviewing the record, it concluded that “to ensure fairness to all [vendors], corrective action is warranted.” DOI noted that it “is unable to support [the] rationale in the award summary where only one [vendor] was given the opportunity to engage in discussions/negotiations with the Government.” GAO dismissed the protest in response to DOI’s corrective action.

Request for Costs

Spry requests that GAO recommend that the agency reimburse its costs of filing and pursuing its protest. Spry argues that DOI unduly delayed taking corrective action, as evidenced by its failure to do so until after filing of the agency report and submission of comments, and that its protest of the agency’s disparate treatment/unequal discussions was clearly meritorious. DOI argues that Spry’s protest of unequal discussions was not clearly meritorious, and therefore Spry is not entitled to reimbursement of protest costs.

Costs Recommended

GAO explained that even when a contracting agency takes corrective action in response to a protest, it may recommend reimbursement of protest costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. GAO will make this recommendation when, “we determine that the agency unduly
delayed taking corrective action in the face of a clearly meritorious protest (i.e., not a
close call), thereby causing the protester to expend unnecessary time and resources to
make further use of the protest process in order to obtain relief.” A protest is considered “clearly meritorious” where a reasonable agency inquiry into the protester’s allegations would reveal facts showing the absence of a defensible legal position.

DOI argues the exchanges with CVP did not amount to discussions, or even if they were discussions, that the agency’s actions were “fair and equitable,” and without prejudice to Spry.
However, GAO found that the record demonstrates that DOI’s exchange with CVP amounted to discussions, stating that “discussions occur when an agency communicates with a vendor for the purpose of obtaining information essential to determine the acceptability of a quotation, or provides the vendor with an opportunity to revise or modify its quotation in some material respect.” Since here, the contracting officer informed CVP of various weaknesses in its technical quotation and offered CVP an opportunity to submit a revised quotation, DOI had discussions with CVP. Additionally, since DOI did not conduct discussions or exchanges with any other vendor, GAO found that DOI’s actions were unequal and favored one vendor over another. Moreover, DOI admitted “the agency is unable to support [the] rationale in the
award summary where only one [vendor] was given the opportunity to engage in
discussions/negotiations with the Government.” Given DOI’s admission that it conducted unequal discussions, GAO concluded that Spry’s protest was clearly meritorious.

GAO also found that Spry’s challenge of the unequal discussions was part of the larger issue of DOI’s unreasonable technical evaluation. Therefore, Spry is entitled to the reimbursement of its protest costs for each ground raised.

GAO recommend that Spry be reimbursed the reasonable costs of filing and pursuing its protest, including attorneys’ fees, including those incurred for requesting a recommendation for costs.

Tagged

Spry Methods

Share

Related Posts

Matter of ANAMAR Environmental Consulting, Inc.

April 11, 2017

SpectrumS4, LLC–Costs, B-408227.4, August 26, 2013

September 10, 2013

Sevatec, Inc.–Costs, B-407880.3, June 27, 2013

August 1, 2013

Rite-Solutions, Inc.–Costs, B-407920.3, June 27, 2013

July 27, 2013

Comments are closed

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-571-223-6845
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2022 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845