• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Matter of Precise Management, LLC

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • March 23, 2020
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)SDVOSB Set-AsidesSmall Business Set-Asides
  • 0 Comments

Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
Disposition: Protest Dismissed
Decided: February 27, 2020
Keywords: Small Business Set-Asides; SDVOSB Set-Asides; Certificate of Competency
General Counsel P.C. Highlight: The SBA has the exclusive authority to review a contracting officer’s determination that a small business concern is not responsible. The GAO does not review certificate of competency referrals to the SBA, or the issuance of, or refusal to issue, a COC absent limited exceptions.

Summary of Facts

Precise Management, LLC, (PM) is a service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB). PM protests the award of a contract to CDS Services, Inc., under request for quotations (RFQ) No. 36C25619Q0881, issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for pest management services. The VA issued the solicitation on May 23, 2019 as a set aside for SDVOSBs. Award was to be made on a lowest-priced, technically acceptable basis, using three technical capability subfactors: relevant experience, contractor personnel/staff qualifications, and past performance. The VA evaluated PM’s quotation and found that it was technically acceptable and offered the lowest price.

However, as part of the responsibility determination, the contracting officer (CO) reviewed the relevant analysis report, which noted that PM “was a high, severe risk in multiple categories throughout the report with the highest (and worst) scores possible (9) in these categories.” Based on this, the CO concluded that PM did not have the financial capability to adequately perform the contract and was therefore nonresponsible and excluded from further consideration. The CO referred his nonresponsibility determination to the SBA for review
under the SBA’s certificate of competency (COC) procedures. The SBA agreed with the determination and denied PM a COC, based on its “overall analysis of the financial resources available, including the inconsistency of and lack of complete financials as well as the lack of financial capacity to perform and existing Tax Liens.”

On September 24, the VA awarded the contract to CDS Services, Inc. On October 2, PM filed an agency-level protest, which the agency denied on December 3, finding that PM was not an interested party.

Basis of Protest

PM challenges the VA’s evaluation of its quotation, including its nonresponsibility determination, the exclusion of its quotation from further consideration, and the award decision. PM also alleges that the VA improperly withheld pertinent information of its responsibility from the SBA when it referred PM for a COC determination.
The VA argues PM’s protest should be dismissed, because the denial of a COC by the SBA is not a matter to be considered by GAO, absent narrowly defined exceptions, not demonstrated by PM.

Protest Dismissed

GAO explained that under the SBA’s COC program, agencies must refer to the SBA a determination that a small business is not responsible if that determination would preclude the small business from receiving an award. Additionally, SBA not GAO, “has the conclusive authority to review a contracting officer’s determination that a small business concern is not responsible.” GAO “does not review COC referrals to the SBA, or the issuance of, or refusal to issue, a COC absent limited exceptions.” The exceptions include protests that allege that the SBA failed to consider vital information bearing on the firm’s responsibility due to the manner in which the information was presented to or withheld from the SBA by the procuring agency.

GAO concluded that PM failed to allege facts that would qualify for an exception for it to review a COC determination made by the SBA. PM alleges that the VA failed to inform the SBA of its intention to exercise a third option year on a separate, ongoing contract that PM was performing for the VA in Louisiana. PM argues that this was vital information, because the other contract “was similar in scope and almost twice the value” of the current requirement, which “overwhelmingly proves” that PM is a responsible contractor.

GAO explained that “responsibility determinations are largely committed to the contracting
officers’ discretion, and conducted on a case-by-case basis.” Additionally, GAO agreed with the VA that a decision to exercise an option on a different contract, at a different location and executed by a different CO is “entirely unrelated” and has “no bearing upon” the CO’s nonresponsibility determination at issue here.

GAO found the two procurements are “unrelated.” Additionally, since there is no evidence that the CO on the current requirement knew of the other contracting team’s decision to exercise the third option on the Louisiana contract, he could not have provided it to, or withheld it from, the SBA when he referred the matter under the COC procedures. Ultimately, GAO concluded that PM failed to show that the manner in which the VA presented information to the SBA was improper, or that the SBA’s denial of a COC to PM resulted from the VA’s failure to inform the SBA of its decision to exercise the third option on the contract.

They dismissed the protest on this basis.

Share

Related Posts

Matter of: M.R. Pittman Group, LLC

May 27, 2021

Matter of DLF-CPC JV, LLC

September 4, 2020

Matter of VBC Commercial Services, LLC

November 7, 2019

Matter of Ekagra Partners

September 30, 2019

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Facility Clearance
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • Impaired Objectivity
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursed Attorney's Fees
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-703-556-0411
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2023 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411