• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Matter of M&C Venture Group, LLC

  • By Lewis Rhodes
  • December 2, 2020
  • Pre-Award ProtestTimeliness of Protest
  • 0 Comments

Matter of M&C Venture Group, LLC

Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Disposition: Protest Dismissed

Decided: September 15, 2020

Keywords: Timeliness of Protest; Preaward Protest

General Counsel P.C. Highlight:

A protest based upon alleged improprieties that are apparent in a solicitation must be filed prior to the closing time for receipt of proposals.

Summary of Facts

M&C Venture Group, LLC (M&C), a service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), protests the terms of RFP No. 36C24219R0109. The RFP was issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), for residential housing services at the Northport VA Medical Center as part of the healthcare for homeless veterans program.

The RFP was issued on August 5, 2019, on an unrestricted basis. The solicitation anticipated award of a fixed-price, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract. Proposal were due on September 6, 2019.  On August 16 and August 26, M&C requested that the VA set aside the procurement for SDVOSBs. On August 20 and August 27, the VA responded that it had conducted market research and determined that there was no reasonable expectation that the VA would receive two or more qualified offers from SDVOSBs at a fair and reasonable price. (The “Rule of Two” set aside requirement).

Following the VA’s initial award decision, M&C filed a protest arguing that the VA failed to evaluate proposals in accordance with the stated evaluation criteria and failed to conduct a proper best-value tradeoff analysis. In response to that protest, the VA proposed to take corrective action by terminating the contract award, reevaluating proposals consistent with the solicitation terms, and making a new award decision. The VA concluded its reevaluation and determined discussions were necessary. On June 10, M&C received a letter informing it that M&C was in the competitive range and identifying areas of its proposal that the VA determined were deficient, weak, or uncertain. Final proposal revisions were due June 17. M&C filed this protest on June 12.

Basis of Protest

M&C alleges the VA’s market research and its decision not to issue the RFP as an SDVOSB set-aside were unreasonable. M&C also argues that by establishing a competitive range, conducting discussions, and requesting revised proposals, the VA failed to implement the corrective action it proposed.

Protest Dismissed

GAO explained that the Bid Protest Regulations contain strict rules for the timely submission of protests. These rules require that a protest based upon alleged improprieties in a solicitation that are apparent prior to the closing time for receipt of initial proposals be filed before that time. GAO noted that, here,

the VA issued the solicitation on August 5, 2019, as an unrestricted procurement with proposals due September 6. M&C emailed the contracting officer TWICE requesting that the procurement be set aside for SDVOSBs. On August 20 and 27 the contracting officer informed M&C that the VA had performed market research and determined that there was no reasonable expectation that the VA would receive two or more qualified offers from SDVOSBs at a fair and reasonable price. GAO determined that, here, M&C was informed 10 days before the initial RFP closed that the VA would

not set aside the procurement for SDVOSBs.  GAO states that this was “ample time” for M&C to file a protest challenging the solicitation terms before the time set for the receipt of proposals. Additionally, GAO explained that the solicitation was issued as an unrestricted procurement initially and no subsequent amendment changed that status. Thus, to be timely, M&C was required to file its protest, challenging the solicitation’s terms and the agency’s market research, before the initial proposal due date, since the basis for M&C’s protest existed in the initial solicitation. GAO concluded that since M&C’s protest was filed after the deadline for initial proposals, it was untimely.

In regards to M&C’s second argument that the VA failed to take the corrective action it proposed, GAO explained that the Bid Protest Regulations require that a protest include a detailed statement of the legal and factual grounds for the protest, and that the grounds stated be legally sufficient. GAO specified that the requirements “contemplate that protesters will provide, at a minimum, either allegations or evidence sufficient, if uncontradicted, to establish the likelihood that the protester will prevail in its claim of improper agency action.” GAO noted that M&C failed to allege facts that establish the likelihood that the VA violated applicable procurement laws or regulations. GAO explained that the VA’s decision to conduct discussions and seek final proposal revisions, which may include revised price proposals, is an inherent part of the procurement process and consistent with the terms of the solicitation. GAO also noted that agencies are not precluded from seeking revised prices even after prices have been exposed.

The GAO dismissed the protest on these grounds.

 

 

Share

Related Posts

Matter of Allosense, Inc.

February 7, 2022

Matter of: M.R. Pittman Group, LLC

May 27, 2021

Matter of: Verizon Business Network Services, Inc.

May 27, 2021

Matter of AGMA Security Service, Inc.

August 7, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Facility Clearance
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • Impaired Objectivity
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursed Attorney's Fees
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-703-556-0411
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2023 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411