• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Matter of DLF-CPC JV, LLC

  • By Lewis Rhodes
  • September 4, 2020
  • 8(a) Sole Source AwardsGAO JurisdictionSmall Business Set-Asides
  • 0 Comments

Matter of DLF-CPC JV, LLC

Agency: Department of the Navy
Disposition: Protest Dismissed
Decided: June 22, 2020
Keywords: Small Business Set-Aside, GAO Jurisdiction, 8(a) Program
General Counsel P.C. Highlight:
Protest that the awardee made a material misrepresentation regarding its bona fide place of business was dismissed where the matter concerned its status as a participant in the 8(a) program, which is for exclusive review by the SBA.

Summary of Facts

DLF-CPC JV, LLC, a joint venture and 8(a) small business, protests the decision by the Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, to award a contract to VLJM JV, LLC, an 8(a) small business entity, under RFP No. N62473-19-R2604, which was issued for paving projects around Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California and Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, California. The RFP was issued on March 18, 2019 and was set-aside for 8(a) small businesses “located within the geographical area serviced by the SBA San Diego District Office and other 8(a) construction firms with a bona fide place of business within the geographical competitive area.”

Five firms submitted proposals, including DLF and VLJM. VLJM is an approved 8(a) joint venture between JM Construction Services, Inc. (JMCSI) and V. Lopez Jr. & Sons General Engineering Contractors Inc. JMCSI is VLJM’s designated 8(a) participant managing business party. On April 4, 2018, approximately a year before issuing the solicitation, the SBA conducted a site visit to JMCSI’s offices in San Diego to verify that they constituted a bona fide place of business. The SBA concluded that JMCSI had established a bona fide branch office in San Diego, California, within the geographical boundaries served by the SBA San Diego District Office.

On December 18, the SBA confirmed VLJM’s 8(a) award eligibility to the Navy. The Navy concluded that VLJM’s proposal represented the best value to the agency and awarded the contract to the firm on December 19. On December 24, DLF filed a size determination protest with the SBA and the Navy and questioned the validity of SBA’s determination regarding JMCSI’s bona fide place of business. The SBA inquired with JMCSI and JMCSI provided documentation reflecting that, on September 25, JMCSI received a notice to vacate its offices by October 25 because the building had been sold. The SBA concluded that, at the time of offer, JMCSI confirmed that it still maintained the approved Bona Fide place of business. The SBA then found that VLJM had leased a new office in San Diego, which was within the relevant geographic area, as of November 1.

On March 4, 2020, the Navy advised DLF that VLJM was the awardee. After requesting and receiving a debriefing, DLF filed this protest.

Basis of Protest

DLF argues that when VLJM submitted its revised price on October 31, 2019, it did not maintain a bona fide office in the relevant geographic area, because its prior lease ended on October 25, and it did not lease its new space until November 1. Thus, DLF argues that JMCSI made a material misrepresentation in its proposal concerning this place of business and should have been found ineligible for award. The Navy argues that GAO lacks jurisdiction over the dispute, because it would require GAO to review the SBA’s determination that VLJM was eligible for award.

Protest Dismissed

Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act authorizes the SBA to enter into contracts with government agencies and to award subcontracts to socially and economically disadvantaged small businesses. GAO explained that under 13 CFR § 124.517(a) “the eligibility of a Participant for a competitive 8(a) requirement may not be challenged by another Participant or any other party, either to SBA or any administrative forum as part of a bid or other contract protest.” GAO noted that while it “will review competitive section 8(a) procurements for compliance with certain applicable procurement regulations,” its review “generally does not extend to matters
that are solely within the purview of SBA.” Specifically, challenges to a small business’s eligibility for award under the 8(a) program “are generally for review by the SBA,” not GAO. GAO concluded that “whether the SBA erred in its eligibility determination is a matter solely for the SBA; our Office will not review substantive determinations by the SBA regarding a program participant’s eligibility for a particular award.”

An exception to the above prohibition from review of 8(a) eligibility challenges exists for
“protests that show possible bad faith on the part of government officials, or that present allegations that the SBA failed to follow its own published regulations or failed to consider vital information bearing on the firm’s responsibility due to the manner in which the information was presented to or withheld from the SBA by the procuring agency.” Here, DLF argued that the SBA failed to follow its own regulations, and, thus, acted in bad faith in finding that JMCSI satisfied the eligibility requirements. GAO explained that “government officials are presumed to act in good faith, and a protester’s contention that contracting officials are motivated by bias or bad faith must be supported by convincing proof.” GAO determined that DLF provided no support for its argument or provided any evidence of bad faith.

The GAO dismissed the protest on this basis.

Share

Related Posts

Matter of R B Toth Associates LLC

March 25, 2020

Matter of Precise Management, LLC

March 23, 2020

Matter of VBC Commercial Services, LLC

November 7, 2019

Matter of Ekagra Partners

September 30, 2019

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Download our Bid Protest Primer FREE eBook!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-703-556-0411
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2021 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411