• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Matter of: Castro & Company, LLC

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • March 9, 2018
  • Bid Protest DecisionsMaterial Solicitation AmendmentRevision of Proposals
  • 0 Comments

Matter of: Castro & Company, LLC

Agency:  Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration

Disposition: Protest Sustained

Keywords: Revision of Proposal, Material Solicitation Amendment

Decided: February 13, 2018

General Counsel P.C. Highlight:   Agencies may not limit offerors to a single area of revision where related areas of an offeror’s quotation are materially impacted.

Summary of Facts

In March of 2017, the Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) issued a Request for Quotations (RFQ) seeking professional services in the area of Finance and Performance Audits under Special Item Number (SIN) 520-7.  The original RFQ specified two required tasks, internal control support services and financial statement audit support.  The RFQ also include two optional tasks, including new guidance surge support and financial services replacement surge support.  According to the RFQ, offerors were instructed to price each task as separate contract line item numbers (CLINs) in a fixed price basis.

Relevant to the discussion here, task three, new guidance surge support, called for surge support not to exceed three full time equivalents (FTEs).  Castro & Company, LLC (Castro) was one of seven who submitted quotations by the May 9 submission date.  On August 11, the agency issued an amendment, removing task four, financial services replacement surge support, from the statement of work.  Revised quotations were received and evaluated, and the award of the task order went to TFC Consulting for $14,672, 135.

Castro and one other vendor filed a protest.  In response, the agency issued a corrective action seeking to clarify the agency’s requirements for task three.  TSA revised the language, clarifying quoters must provide the agency three full time employees to perform the scope of tasks required in task three.  In light of the corrective action, the protest was dismissed on November 1, 2017.

However, the agency’s amendment deleted the “NTE three FTEs” language and modified the CLIN to read “3 full time individuals.”  Offerors were instructed to update quotations in light of this change in requirements.  However, offerors were specifically prohibited from modifying any portion of the quotation beyond task three.

Basis for Protest

Castro protests, arguing the restriction is inherently prejudicial against offerors whose proposals utilized staffing strategies taking advantage of “perceived efficiencies in tasks one and two, to address the potential needs of task three.”  Additionally, Castro argues the requirement of three full time staff on task three should allow offerors to make corresponding adjustments to the rest of the overall staffing strategy.

The agency responded the amendment did not have any impact on other aspects of the quotation, as the amendment merely clarified an ambiguity.  Further, the agency points out task three was identified as optional, thus “inherently severable from the rest of the scope of work.”  Since offerors could not presume the option would be exercised, they cannot assume proposed efficiencies based on the optional task.

GAO Decision

As a general premise, contracting officials have broad discretion in taking corrective action.  However, the action must be appropriate to remedy the concern.  Agencies may not prevent offerors from revising related areas of their quotation that are materially impacted by the corrective action.  The GAO reviewed the Castro quotation, finding Castro’s strategy for task three did, indeed, include using personnel and labor hours across all three tasks.  Additionally, when optional task 4 was deleted, Castro revised labor hours for personnel proposed for the other tasks, thus supporting Castro’s position.

Based on the record before them, the GAO found the amendment materially impacted certain aspects of the Castro quotation, beyond the areas where the agency allowed modification.  Because agencies are not allowed to prohibit offerors from revising related areas of a quotation materially impacted, the GAO found the agency’s action precluding offerors from revising related areas was improper.

Protest Sustained

Recommend the TAS amend the solicitation to allow revision of all aspects of quotations related to the amendment of the optional task three.

 

Share

Related Posts

Matter of Wamore, Inc.

November 13, 2019

Matter of Vertical Jobs, Inc.

June 19, 2018

Matter of: Herman Construction Group, Inc.

January 24, 2018

Matter of: Goodwill Industries of the Valleys: SourceAmerica

December 20, 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-571-223-6845
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2022 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845