• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Matter of American Systems Group

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • June 26, 2020
  • Pre-Award ProtestPrice RealismTimeliness of Protest
  • 0 Comments

Matter of American Systems Group

Agency: Department of the Air Force

Disposition: Protest Dismissed

Decided: June 9, 2020

Keywords: Timeliness of Protest; Price Realism; Pre-Award Protest

General Counsel P.C. Highlight: Protests must be filed no later than 10 days after the protester knew, or should have known, of the basis for protest, whichever is earlier.

Summary of Facts 

American Systems Group (ASG) protests the award of a contract to Summit Services, Inc., under RFQ No. FA4690-19-Q-A035 by the Department of the Air Force. ASG challenges the agency’s decision to reject the firm’s quotation as being unrealistic pursuant to a price realism evaluation.

The RFQ was issued on September 16, 2019 as a competitive set-aside for participants in the Small Business Administration’s Historically Underutilized Business Zone program. The RFQ sought quotations to provide administrative support services and award was to be made on a best-value basis considering past performance and price.

Under the RFQ’s stated evaluation scheme, quotations were to be evaluated for responsiveness and price. The agency would then make a best-value award decision based on the past performance evaluation and a determination that the vendor’s price was fair and reasonable. The solicitation stated that the agency “reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest priced quote if the lowest priced quote is judged to have a performance rating of unacceptable.”

Twenty-one quotations were received, including one from ASG. The Air Force found that ASG proposed a price below the calculated cutoff price, and excluded it based on a determination that the proposed TEP was unrealistic. ASG was informed that it would not be awarded the contract on February 20, 2020. In that letter, ASG was notified of the winning quotation’s price and that ASG’s quotation “was not accepted because [its] quote was not determined to be the best value in accordance with the evaluation factors.” 

ASG requested a debriefing and the Air Force provided a written explanation on February 27, notifying ASG that the firm’s TEP “did not meet the price evaluation standard for realism.” ASG filed an initial protest on February 28, and the Air Force asked GAO to dismiss the protest, arguing that ASG’s challenge was untimely. However, GAO requested that the parties submit additional briefings on their respective interpretations of the price realism requirement found in the solicitation. The parties complied, and ASG argued, for the first time, that the Air Force’s method of performing the price realism evaluation was inconsistent with the terms of the solicitation. GAO declined to dismiss the protest at that time and requested that the Air Force submit an agency report to provide a full record for review. ASG filed this protest on March 4.

Basis of Protest 

ASG first argues that the agency “capriciously adopted” a 25% price realism factor in its price analysis. ASG then argued that the agency’s method of performing the price realism evaluation to quotations was inconsistent with the terms of the solicitation. The Air Force argued that ASG’s allegations should be dismissed as untimely, because ASG knew or should have known of this basis of protest at the time of award.

Protest Dismissed

GAO concluded that ASG’s allegations were untimely. Under Bid Protest Regulations, a protest based upon alleged improprieties in a solicitation that are apparent prior to the closing time for receipt of initial proposals must be filed before that time. ASG argues that the agency “capriciously adopted” a 25% price realism factor in its price analysis. However, the solicitation clearly states that factor. Thus, GAO determined vendors were on notice that a price realism analysis was contemplated under the solicitation. Since ASG’s first allegation is essentially a challenge to the terms of the solicitation, ASG was required to file its protest prior to the closing time for receipt of initial proposals, but did not.

Additionally, under GAO regulations, “protests must be filed no later than 10 days after the protester knew, or should have known, of the basis for protest, whichever is earlier.” GAO determined that ASG’s argument that the agency misapplied the price realism criteria in its evaluation, could have been raised in its initial protest, but was not.

GAO explained that ASG knew from the unsuccessful vendor notice it received on February 20 both its own price and that of the awardee. ASG subsequently learned from the Air Force’s February 27 letter that ASG’s quotation was rejected based on the agency’s price realism analysis. Based on these facts, GAO determined that ASG could have, but did not, raise this allegation in the initial protest filed on February 28.

ASG based its argument on information available at the time of award and prior to production of the agency report. Since ASG did not raise this allegation within 10 days of when it knew or should have known of the basis of protest, GAO concluded the allegation is untimely.

The GAO dismissed the protest on this basis.

Share

Related Posts

Matter of Allosense, Inc.

February 7, 2022

Matter of: M.R. Pittman Group, LLC

May 27, 2021

Matter of: Verizon Business Network Services, Inc.

May 27, 2021

Matter of Patronus Systems, Inc.

December 3, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Facility Clearance
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • Impaired Objectivity
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursed Attorney's Fees
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-703-556-0411
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2023 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411