• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Matter of: Goodwill Industries of the Valleys: SourceAmerica

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • December 20, 2017
  • Bid Protest DecisionsJavits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • 0 Comments

Agency: General Services Administration (GSA)

Disposition: Protest Sustained

Keywords:  Javits-Wagner-O’Day Act

Decided: November 29, 2017

Released: December 6, 2017

General Counsel P.C. Highlight:

The Javits-Wagner-O’Day Act requiring the use of a mandatory source for services cannot be overcome by including such services in a “full service” lease to another.

Summary of Facts

The GSA has leased a building housing the Charlottesville courthouse from VVP, LLC for several years.  This lease of office and related space was set to expire in January of 2018.  Separately, GSA contracted with Goodwill Industries of the Valleys (Goodwill) to provide custodial services for the Charlottesville courthouse.  This contract was set to expire at the end of January, 2018.

In October of 2016, VVP contacted Goodwill, indicating they were negotiating a new lease with
GSA.  The email contact stated, in relevant part, “It appears we [VVP] will be taking over the cleaning contract.”  The email requested Goodwill provide information about the scope of work and a quote for the work.  Goodwill sent a proposal for custodial services.  Included in the email were various assumptions, including that the proposal contemplated an award of a contract between Goodwill and VVP, pursuant to the anticipated GSA lease.  Goodwill noted they were the mandatory designated source for custodial services, pursuant to the Javits-Wagner-O’Day Act (JWOD Act).

In May of 2017, the GSA informed Goodwill they would not be renewing Goodwill’s contract for custodial services for the Charlottesville courthouse.  Goodwill reached out to GSA to confirm VVP would be required to procure custodial services from Goodwill, pursuant to the JWOD Act.  GSA responded they had no authority to direct VVP to use a particular contractor to perform the custodial services.

Goodwill’s protest followed.

Basis for Protest

The JWOD Act is designed to increase both training and employment opportunities for blind and severely disabled people.  It authorizes noncompetitive acquisition of certain, specified products and services from nonprofit agencies.  The Act states the Federal Government shall procure certain products and services from identified nonprofit agencies.  When a contracting activity includes as one of many requirements a service on the list, the procurement shall require their contractors procure the identified services from designated nonprofit agencies.

Goodwill previously held the contract independent of VVP, under a federal regulation designating Goodwill as the provider of custodial services at the Charlottesville Courthouse.  This federal regulation was developed and enacted in 2004.  Goodwill’s protest argues while the GAO combined the leasing contract previously held by VVP and the custodial contract held by Goodwill, VVP had the obligation to contract custodial services to Goodwill under the Act.

GSA argued:

  • The General Accounting Office (GAO) does not have jurisdiction about protests relating to the JWOD Act;
  • The protest was not timely;
  • The protesters are not qualified interested parties;
  • The violation is related to contract administration; and/or
  • The protest involves a subcontract.

Any one of these, the GSA argues, should result in dismissal of the protest.  The GAO rejects these arguments entirely, and proceeds to the merits of the protest.

GAO Decision

In support of their position denying the award of the custodial services contract to Goodwill, either directly, or as a condition of a leasing contract with VVP, the GSA argues the JWOD Act does not apply to leasing contracts.  However, they cite no caselaw or statutory provision, nor any other authority for this position.

In reviewing the plain language of the Act, the GAO finds no basis for GSA’s assertion.  They find GSA bundled custodial services in with a building lease without regard to the JWOD Act, and without instruction their contracted lessor to comply with the JWOD Act.

Protest Sustained

In light of the finding, the GAO recommends GSA either contract with Goodwill separately or require VVP to contract with Goodwill for custodial services, consistent with the mandates of the JWOD Act.

 

Share

Related Posts

Matter of Wamore, Inc.

November 13, 2019

Matter of Vertical Jobs, Inc.

June 19, 2018

Matter of: Castro & Company, LLC

March 9, 2018

Matter of: Herman Construction Group, Inc.

January 24, 2018

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-571-223-6845
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2022 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845