• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Matter of Express Medical Transporters Inc.

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • October 17, 2016
  • Bid Protests
  • 0 Comments

Matter of Express Medical Transporters, Inc. (April 20, 2016)

Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)

Disposition: Denied in part and dismissed in part

General Counsel P.C. Highlight: Protestors bear the burden of demonstrating, affirmatively, that the awardee’s proposal does not comply with the terms of the RFP.  

Summary of Facts

On July 21, 2015, the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) as a small business set aside, seeking non-emergency transportation services, specifically servicing James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital in Tampa, Florida.  The RFP contemplated “…all supervision, personnel, vehicles, equipment, transportation, material, supplies, and other items necessary to provide transportation…”  The RFP contemplated awarding the proposal to the lowest priced, technically acceptable offeror.

For the purposes of this particular protest, the critical portion of the RFP was a clause of the FAR incorporated by reference, FAR 52.219-14.  More specifically, protester pointed out that FAR 52.219-14 (a) limits offerors use of subcontractors, requiring that “…at least 50 % of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees…”

Five proposals were submitted, including a proposal from Express Medical Transporters, Inc., (EMT), the protester, and a proposal from Wheelchair Transport Services, Inc., (WTS), the awardee.  Upon being informed of the Agency’s decision to award the contract to WTS, EMT filed an agency-level protest on January 8, 2016.  WTS’ primary basis for protesting was that WTS was neither responsive nor a responsible offeror.  EMT alleged that WTS would not comply with the wage requirements or the subcontracting limitations in the RFP, because of its intention to rely, almost exclusively, on subcontractors to perform the transportation services.  EMT also contended, in a footnote, that WTS did not have the required Small Business Certification, which was required to be considered a responsible offeror for the solicitation.

On January 26, 2016, the Agency dismissed the protest, without addressing EMT’s expressed concern about WTS’ Small Business Certification.  The Agency also did not forward the protest to the Small Business Administration (SBA) for review or investigation at that time.

On January 29, 2016, EMT filed a protest with the GAO.  During the pendency of the GAO protest, the VA did forward EMT’s allegation to the SBA.  On March 10, 2016, the SBA found EMT’s protest to be untimely, but, citing FAR 19.302 (a), still initiated a size protest.  On April 1, 2016, the SBA determined WTS did, in fact, qualify as a small business for the purpose of the present procurement.

Offeror Not Required to Demonstrate Compliance with Proposal

As a preliminary matter, the GAO noted that review of an offeror’s compliance with the subcontracting limitation clause is confined to the proposal itself.  Generally speaking, an agency’s judgment as to whether a small business offeror will comply with the subcontracting limitation clause is a matter of responsibility, and the contractor’s actual compliance is a matter of contract administration.  

That said, GAO found that offerors are not required to demonstrate compliance with such limitations affirmatively.  Instead, compliance is presumed, unless there is language in the proposal that specifically negates such a presumption.  When a party submits an offer, such an offer is deemed a demonstration of agreement to be bound by the terms of the RFP.

The Protestor bears the burden of demonstrating, affirmatively, that the awardee’s proposal does not comply with the limitations on subcontracting.  Arguments that an awardee did not affirmatively establish compliance are insufficient.  The Protestor must identify information in the offeror’s proposal that demonstrates that the offer has not agreed to comply with terms of the RFP.

Protest Denied

Accordingly, EMT’s protest was denied by GAO as to the allegation that WTS would not comply with the subcontracting limitations because “…EMT fails to point to any portion of WTS’ proposal in which WTS states an intent to rely almost exclusively on independent contract drivers. In the absence of any such indication, GAO concluded that there was nothing on the face of the proposal that should have led the agency to conclude that WTS had not agreed to comply with the subcontracting limitation…”

Tagged

compliance with RFPproposal acceptabilitysubcontracting provisions

Share

Related Posts

GAO’s BID PROTEST – 2020 YEAR IN REVIEW

January 19, 2021

New Procedure For Submitting Bid Protests Coming in May 2018

April 17, 2018

Matter of David Jones, CPA PC

October 13, 2017

Timely Filing in the Matter of: SageCare, Inc.; AeroSage, LLC

August 14, 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-571-223-6845
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2022 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845