• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Five Factors for Proposal Evaluation – Creating Bids that Will Survive a Protest

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • March 9, 2018
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • 0 Comments
Five Factors for Proposal Evaluation – Creating Bids that Will Survive a Protest

Submitting the winning bid is an exhilarating feeling, dimmed only by the following days, as the offeror waits to hear if others may file a protest.  Once a protest is filed, offerors options are limited. One option that is available to offerors, but often ignored is the right to hire qualified counsel to represent their interests.  Government contract attorneys are in a unique position, in that, while they are ethically obligated to protect their client’s interests, they are prohibited from discussing certain information with their clients.  This frustrates offerors, and limits an attorney’s opportunities to provide valuable information about how things might have been different, had the offeror only done something different.

In this article, we seek to proactively address some factors we have seen which have tipped the scales either for or against an offeror in past protests.  We also seek to offer some hands on, practical solutions which can make your bid more likely to survive a protest.  You can’t control what the agency does during a protest, but you can ensure your proposal will be reviewed in the best possible light by addressing the issues discussed below.

1.   Seek Clarification

If you are confused about a term or condition of the solicitation, seek clarification.  Just guessing about what the agency wants does not serve you.  Seeking clarification allows you to address each requirement fully and head on.  In most cases, failure to understand a requirement will lead to a failure to address all issues an agency has in mind when issuing a request for proposals (RFP).  Remember, the agency’s evaluation, and the review during any subsequent protest, will focus on whether the bid met the terms of the solicitation.  Thus, understanding the terms of the solicitation is critical to creating a successful offer that survives a protest.

2.   Provide a Detailed Road Map

All too often, we hear our clients exclaim, “But I did address all five factors in my proposal!” In these situations, a review of the proposal reveals a single paragraph with an umbrella heading.  If there are five factors you must address, give each factor its own heading and discussion.  If you only have one or two sentences for each factor, consider a bullet list, like this:

  • Factor One: Our company provides detailed Factor One services. We began offering Factor One services in 1977, and have employees well versed in Factor One issues.
  • Factor Two: The education levels required by Factor Two are met for each key personnel position. Our top three proposed personnel have the requisite Ph.D’s, and our five managerial positions will be filled with key personnel with master’s degrees (or better), as required.
  • Et cetera, et cetera.

Remember that there are often a large number of bids are submitted for each solicitation, and evaluators have a large amount of information to review in each proposal.  Make it easy for them to locate evaluation factors, and make sure their evaluation is easy to defend, by clearly establishing that you have met the solicitation requirements.

3.   Cross Reference Costs

You’d be surprised how often the figures listed in the proposal’s written summary, and the figures listed in the line by line budget disagree.  Perhaps the evaluator won’t notice the inconsistencies, but you can bet an attorney filing a protest will be looking for just such a discrepancy.  This is an easy thing to check before submitting your proposal.  Don’t give the government, or a protester, the opportunity to challenge your winning bid based on a simple, easily correctable oversight. Always double-check your numbers and eliminate this grounds for a protest from your proposals.

4.   Cross Reference FTEs

While you are cross referencing dollar amounts, take time to cross reference any and all references to full time equivalents (FTEs).  Once again, the number of times the proposal and the budget are inconsistent in regards to FTEs is appalling. Take the time to make sure your numbers add up.  Proposals that suggest 15 FTEs are needed, but only budget for 12, may fail during a protest.  Because different sections may be evaluated by different people or different teams, and often evaluated at different times, these inconsistencies may be missed during the evaluation process.  (Imagine reviewing 12 proposals for technical acceptability, then evaluating the budgets of those same 12 proposals.)  These inconsistencies between your winning bid, and that of a disappointed offeror, however, are less likely to be missed.

5.   Make Sure Your Proposal Establishes that You Meet the Requirements

Do not presume the evaluator “knows” you meet the requirements.  A simple assertion you meet the requirements is unlikely to be considered sufficient during a protest.  In fact, simply repeating the language of the RFP has specifically been found to fail as proof of competence or compliance.  Make sure each requirement of the RFP is addressed in your proposal.

Bonus Tip: Don’t Face a Bid Protest Alone!

If you are facing a bid protest, don’t do it alone.  While you are, technically, allowed to represent yourself, our experience indicates that self-representation is not a good idea.  A qualified attorney experienced in government contract law can provide the support you need during a protest. You can bet that a protester will have an attorney on their side. If you are facing a protest, contact us for a consultation today.

Share

Related Posts

Best Value: Making Sure Your Proposal Reflects Best Value, Not Just Lowest Price

June 21, 2018

Price Realism as the Basis for a Protest

June 21, 2018

New Procedure For Submitting Bid Protests Coming in May 2018

April 17, 2018

Top 3 Technical Evaluation Factors that Lead to a Bid Protest and How to Avoid Them

March 9, 2018

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Facility Clearance
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • Impaired Objectivity
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursed Attorney's Fees
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-703-556-0411
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2023 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411