Link: GAO Decision Protestor: SGT, Inc. Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Disposition: Protest Denied. ____________________________________________________________________ GAO Digest: Protest that agency misevaluated awardee’s proposal is denied where record shows that agency’s evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation’s evaluation scheme. Protest that agency disparately evaluated awardee’s and protester’s proposals is denied where record shows
Link: GAO Opinion Protestor: Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc. Agency: Department of the Army Disposition: Protest denied. _________________________________________________________________________ GAO Digest: Protest challenging a source selection authority’s (SSA) disagreement with past performance evaluation rating assigned by lower level evaluators is denied where SSA’s rationale was reasonable, consistent with the evaluation criteria, and documented. Protest challenging evaluation of
Link: GAO Opinion Agency: Department of the Army Disposition: Protest denied. Keywords: Evaluation; Source Selection Authority General Counsel P.C. Highlight: Source selection officials have broad discretion in determining the manner and extent to which they will make use of technical and price evaluation results. GAO reviews the decision, not of the evaluators, but of the source
Agencies: U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Disposition: Protest Denied. Keywords: Best value; Source Selection Authority General Counsel, P.C. Highlight: In considering a bid protest, a Court will not reevaluate proposals or substitute its opinion for the Source Selection Authority, but will only consider whether the decisions made were reasonable in light of the RFP requirements.
Link: GAO Opinion Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Disposition: Protest denied. ________________________________________________________________________________ GAO Digest: 1. Protest challenging evaluation of awardee’s perceived overstaffing of requirement is denied where record shows that agency reasonably determined that the weakness did not reflect awardee’s lack of understanding of solicitation requirements and that consideration of the overstaffing, which was