Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Disposition: Protest Sustained Keywords: Unstated evaluation criteria, competitive range. Decided: May 19, 2017 General Counsel P.C. Highlight: Evaluations must not rely on unstated evaluation criteria. When assessing the competitive range, evaluation must be on specific aspects of a proposal, not based on point scores or adjectival ratings. Summary of
Link: GAO Opinion Agency: Department of the Army Disposition: Protest denied. General Counsel P.C. Highlight: GAO denied the protest of Global Technology Systems, Inc. (GTS) regarding its exclusion from the competitive range under a request for proposals (RFP) for high capacity batteries, issued by the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO), a component of
Link: GAO Opinion Agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency Disposition: Protest denied. General Counsel P.C. Highlight: GAO denied the protest of KAES Enterprises, LLC based on its exclusion from the competitive range, under a request for proposals (RFP), issued by the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for generator maintenance services. The RFP
Link: GAO Opinion Agency: Department of the Army Disposition: Protest sustained. General Counsel P.C. Highlight: GAO sustained the protest of Global Dynamics, LLC (GD) regarding the exclusion of its proposal from competitive range under a request for proposals (RFP), issued by the Department of the Army for registered nursing services for the San Antonio Military
Link: GAO Opinion Agency: Department of Homeland Security Disposition: Protest denied. General Counsel P.C. Highlight: GAO denied the protest of e-Management, based on the exclusion of its proposal from the competitive range under a request for proposals (RFP) issued by the Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), for enterprise architecture
Link: GAO Opinion Agency: Department of the Army Disposition: Protest denied. General Counsel P.C. Highlight: GAO denied the protest of FPM Remediations, Inc., based on the exclusion of its proposal from the competitive range under a request for proposals (RFP), issued by the Department of the Army for environmental remediation services. The RFP was issued
Link: GAO Opinion Agency: Department of the Navy Disposition: Protest denied. Keywords: Competitive Range; Prejudice General Counsel P.C. Highlight: GAO denied the protest of Smith Enterprise, Inc. regarding the exclusion of its proposal from the competitive range under a request for proposals (RFP), issued by the Department of the Navy for research and development services
Link: GAO Opinion Agency: United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Disposition: Protest denied. General Counsel P.C. Highlight: GAO denies the protest of Crown Agents USA, Inc., regarding the exclusion of its proposal from the competitive range under a request for proposals (RFP), issued by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to obtain
Link: GAO Opinion Agency: Department of the Army Disposition: Protest denied. General Counsel P.C. Highlight: GAO denies the protest of Kaseman, LLC, based on the elimination of its proposal from the competitive range under a request for proposals (RFP) issued by the Department of the Army, for services in support of the agency’s Logistics Civil
Link: GAO Opinion Agency: United States Agency for International Development Disposition: Protest denied. General Counsel P.C. Highlight: GAO denied the protest of the Louis Berger Group, Inc., based on the exclusion of its proposal from the competitive range under a request for proposals (RFP), issued by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for