• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Can You File a Protest and Maintain a Good Relationship with Your Government Customer?

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • September 17, 2014
  • Bid ProtestsGovernment Contracts
  • 0 Comments

by Rocky Galloway

Bid protests provide a remedy under federal government contracting procedures for aggrieved contractors to challenge the award or prospective award of a contract for goods and services, or to challenge the terms of a solicitation. When deciding on whether to file a bid protest, contractors often have to consider two factors:

  1. Are there sufficient grounds to sustain the protest and receive the remedy sought, and
  2. What effect does filing the protest have on the present and future business relationship with the government customer

The first consideration is more fact-based, and therefore the appropriate path is easier to discern. Even after establishing the facts, contractors must still evaluate the chance of success versus the cost of filing and pursuing a bid protest. The second consideration is much less tangible but could be equally if not more important depending on the business objectives and the relationship of the parties involved. Most government representatives understand that bid protests are part of the contracting process. That said, the very nature of filing a protest calls into question the competency and professionalism of the government’s representatives (e.g., Contracting Officer, Source Selection Officials). The end result is that these individuals often perceive the protest as a personal attack on the quality of their work and become overly vested in protecting their reputations.

There are several ways to file a protest without directly challenging the judgment of your government customer who made an award to a competitor. In procurements set aside for small businesses, 8(a) contractors, HUBZone contractors, or Service-Disabled, Veteran Owned contractors, contractors can protest a prospective awardee’s eligibility or qualifying status without involving the Contracting Officer, except to the extent that the Contracting Officer is the designated recipient of the protest. In these cases, the Contracting Officer does not decide the protest and does not have to defend the award or the awardee. Upon receipt of a size/status protest, the Contracting Officer forwards the protest to the SBA Regional Office with jurisdiction over the awardee. At that point, the awardee has to defend itself before the designated SBA Regional Office without the assistance or involvement of the Contracting Officer or other government representatives.

Another way that contractors can challenge an unfavorable award decision without potentially ruining the business relationship with the government customer is by filing an agency-level protest. Each federal agency has its own internal procedures for handling agency level protests. Most are very informal and may involve only the Contracting Officer and the agency’s legal counsel. Some agencies have an objective, independent, and formal review procedure. Agency-level protests have the advantage of offering a face-saving way for a Contracting Officer to correct an obvious error without the broad exposure, document production requirements, and strict oversight that comes with a protest filed at the Government Accountability Office (GAO). It is important to note that filing an agency-level protest does not foreclose the possibility of filing a GAO protest. However, agency-level protests do not grant an automatic stay of performance of the awarded contract until the protest is resolved, which many consider to be a key advantage to filing protests with GAO.

Perhaps the least favorite protest venue of government customers is the GAO. Depending on the issue in dispute, GAO protests can require extensive levels of discovery, document production and legal responses, all of which are very time sensitive. Once a GAO protest is filed, notice is immediately given to the agency, which then has the option of granting the remedy requested by the protester or if it deems the allegations to be without merit, the agency will file a report with GAO. The agency report is a complete factual response to the allegations provided to all parties, including interested parties (e.g., other affected bidders) that become part of the protest as intervenors. Preparation of the agency report involves multiple organizations within the agency (including the Contracting Officer, Source Selection Officials, and Legal Counsel) and can be time consuming and costly for all parties involved. In addition to the agency report, there may be additional requests for information by either party, including the GAO.

The final venue for protesting an award decision is the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (CoFC). The CoFC will consider, de novo, a bid protest that has previously been denied at the agency-level or by GAO. One of the primary reasons contractors file protests at the CoFC is that there is no timeliness requirement for a post-award bid protest (GAO has a strict 10-day deadline for filing after grounds for the protest are known). At the CoFC, the government is represented solely by lawyers from the U.S. Department of Justice. This requires the government customer and its agency counsel to work with lawyers who are not familiar with the agency’s procedures or its procurement actions. Understandably, filing a protest with the CoFC is considered an escalation of the dispute with the government customer and requires a tremendous use of resources by all parties. Therefore, if a contractor is concerned about maintaining a relationship with its government customer, that will be difficult to do so if CoFC is the protest venue.

It must be emphasized that at each protest venue, the decision to file a protest should be carefully considered. If the merits of the case are strong and maintaining a good working relationship with the customer has value, the best approach is to present it in a forum that is least burdensome on all parties involved.

Share

Related Posts

General Counsel, P.C. Government Contracts Team Protest Success

July 29, 2021

GAO’s BID PROTEST – 2020 YEAR IN REVIEW

January 19, 2021

Matter of Millennium Corporation, Inc.

March 26, 2019

Matter of Intuitive Research and Technology Corporation

March 26, 2019

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-571-223-6845
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2022 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • WHAT is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • WHY Should you file a bid protest?
    • WHEN Must you file a bid protest?
    • WHERE can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-571-223-6845