• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • What is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • Why Should you file a bid protest?
    • When Must you file a bid protest?
    • Where can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

C2G Ltd. Company, B-411131, May 12, 2015

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • June 10, 2015
  • Bid Protests
  • 0 Comments

img

Home      |      About the Firm      |      Practice Areas      |      Resources      |     Contact

General Counsel, P.C.’s Government Contracts Practice Group is pleased to provide you with the Bid Protest Weekly.  Researched, written and distributed by the attorneys of General Counsel, P.C., theBid Protest Weekly allows the Government Contract community to stay on top of the latest developments involving bid protests by providing summaries of recent bid protest decisions, highlighting key areas of law, agencies, and analyses of the protest process in general.

General Counsel, P.C.’s Government Contracts Group has over fifty years of combined government contract law experience (both as government, in-house, outside legal counsel), helping clients solve their government contract problems relating to the award or performance of a federal government contract, including bid protests, contract claims, small business concerns, and teaming and subcontractor relations.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the discussed content, or questions about bid protests, please feel free to contact the attorneys at General Counsel, P.C. at 703-556-0411or visit us at www.generalcounsellaw.com


C2G Ltd. Company, B-411131, May 12, 2015

Link:  GAO Opinion

Agency:  Defense Logistics Agency

Disposition:  Protest denied

Keywords:  Timeliness of Bid; Reverse Auction

General Counsel P.C. Highlight:

In the case of electronic submissions, it is the responsibility of the offeror to ensure that a bid is transmitted in sufficient time to allow for reasonable lag times in processing over the internet such that the bid is received in advance of the deadline for receipt of proposals.

C2G Ltd. Company (C2G) protested the non-acceptance of its revised bid submitted during a RFP.

The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) issued a RFP, set aside for small businesses, for a time-and-materials contract for scheduled and unscheduled maintenance services on government-owned equipment located at DLA Distribution Red River, Texas. The award was to be made on a lowest-priced, technically acceptable (LPTA) basis. The RFP incorporated the DLA directive for reverse auctions which defined the obligations of the agency and offerors.

One day prior to the auction, DLA invited offerors to participate in a “mock” web-based reverse auction run by Procurex, Inc. (“Procurex”), a third party reverse auction system provider. C2G and a second offeror participated in the mock reverse auction.

On February 6, 2015, at 9:00 am EST, DLA conducted the reverse auction using Procurex as its system provider. The bidding was scheduled to end at 9:30 am EST. The auction included an automatic extension provision which would trigger a three minute extension if a bid was successfully placed within the last minute of the auction. The auction required the offeror to complete three steps in order to successfully place a bid: (1) enter a bid at least $1,000 less than the current lead bid; (2) successfully preview and verify its bid after being prompted by the system; and (3) successfully click on the “place bid” prompt which would trigger a “Successful Bid Placed” acknowledgment. Prior to C2G’s last bid, the offerors took between five and fifteen seconds to successfully place their bids after previewing their bids.

C2G and the other offeror who participated in the mock auction placed bids during the auction. At 9:04:34 am EST, C2G successfully placed a bid and became the “lead” bidder. At 9:28:55 am EST, the other offeror submitted a bid and became the “lead” bidder. Because it was more than one minute before the end of the auction, the automatic extension was not triggered. C2G successfully input a revised bid and successfully previewed and verified its bid at 9:29:58 am EST. C2G contends that it then clicked on the place bid button one second before the end of the auction.  DLA contends that the revised bid was not received as evidenced by the system’s generation of an error message indicating that the bid failed and that the auction had ended.  C2G argued that the system malfunctioned when it did not accept the revised proposal bid. DLA contends that the bid was not timely received and that the system did not malfunction.

According to the GAO, it is the responsibility of the offeror to ensure that its proposal is timely delivered by transmitting it in advance of the deadline for receipt of proposals. Proposals received after the exact time specified are late and generally not considered for an award. Further, unless it is shown to be unreasonable, the contracting officer’s declaration that the procurement is closed is determinative.

The GAO concluded that C2G failed to prove that either its revised bid was timely submitted and received or that the system malfunctioned. The GAO finds that C2G did not complete the second step of the process until two seconds before the end of the auction. According to the GAO, even assuming that within the remaining two seconds the system generated the prompt for C2G to place its bid, there is no evidence that the revised bid was timely received by DLA.

Procurex represented that the revised bid was not received prior to the closing time and acknowledged that there is a lag time of between a few seconds to fifteen seconds between the time when the bidder clicks the “place bid” and the system processes the bid. Given that this lag time is consistent with common knowledge and experience with the internet, the GAO concludes that there is no basis to challenge the reasonableness of the DLA’s determination that C2G’s proposal was not timely received. C2G argued that DLA was obligated to disclose the potential lag time. The GAO concluded that this was not necessary given that delays in processing are common knowledge and because an agency is not obligated to inform offerors of all potential risks in the bidding process. Rather, the onus is on the offeror to ensure that proposals are timely received. Further, as C2G had already participated in the mock auction where lag times were observed, any issues or concerns could have been addressed prior to the actual reverse auction.

C2G’s protest was denied.


General Counsel, P.C. – Experienced Representation of Government Contractors:  Led byRocky Galloway, General Counsel’s GovCon Practice Group has over thirty years of government contract law experience.  Our attorneys have experience relevant to the entire life-cycle of a government contractor, including formation, contract negotiation and award, contract administration, bid and contract disputes, and Mergers and Acquisitions transactions.

Every Business Needs a General Counsel — Founded in 2004 by Merritt Green, General Counsel, P.C. represents businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and individuals throughout the DC Metropolitan Area and across the nation and globe. The firm has eight (8) practice areas to fully serve our clients:  (1) Corporate/Business Law; (2) Government Contracts; (3) State/Federal Litigation/Dispute Resolution; (4) Employment Law; (5) Immigration; (6) Intellectual Property; (7) Franchising; and (8) Not for Profits.

Share

Related Posts

GAO’s BID PROTEST – 2020 YEAR IN REVIEW

January 19, 2021

New Procedure For Submitting Bid Protests Coming in May 2018

April 17, 2018

Matter of David Jones, CPA PC

October 13, 2017

Timely Filing in the Matter of: SageCare, Inc.; AeroSage, LLC

August 14, 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Facility Clearance
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • Impaired Objectivity
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursed Attorney's Fees
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-703-556-0411
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2023 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • What is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • Why Should you file a bid protest?
    • When Must you file a bid protest?
    • Where can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411