• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-202-770-2939

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Bidding on “Alternate” Bid Item Not Always Required

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • April 11, 2014
  • Blog ArticlesUncategorized
  • 0 Comments

Bid Protest Weekly Newsletter by Bryan R. King, Attorney, General Counsel PC

Date: Friday, April 11, 2014, 2:29pm EST

Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain, LLC, B-409208.2, April 3, 2014
Several recent articles have discussed relatively minor issues that cost a contractor an opportunity for an award. We’ve seen an offeror fail to respond to a solicitation amendment, an offeror fail to confirm its emailed submission was actually received by the agency, and an offeror fail to include 3 of the required 3,000+ labor rates in its proposal. In each of those situations, the offeror’s proposal-related failure prevented the offending offeror from receiving further consideration for award. We’re going to switch gears this week, and discuss a case where an offeror’s omission of a bid price on its proposal did not disqualify it from receiving an award.

Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain, LLC is actually a story of two separate protests of a procurement conducted by the Dept. of Veterans Affairs (VA). The VA issued an invitation for bids (IFB) for construction services at the VA Medical Center in Martinsburg, WV. Several amendments to the IFB were issued. One such amendment established two bid line items. The first line item was the base bid line item for the required renovations to the building. The second line item was expressly labeled as an “alternate” item, which removed a wheelchair lift from the requirement of the base line item.

The low bidder submitted a bid price for the base line item, but did not submit a bid for the alternate line item. The VA initially determined that the low bidder’s failure to submit a price for the alternate line item disqualified it from award, and thus the VA announced an award to Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain (HPC). However, the low bidder filed a bid protest with GAO challenging its rejection. The low bidder argued that because the alternate line item was a deduction from the base bid price, the agency could award either the full project or the project minus the wheelchair lift at the same price. The low bidder’s bid price was low either way, thus it argued it should have been selected for award.

The VA ultimately agreed with the low bidder, and took corrective action rescinding its rejection of the low bid. As a result of the corrective action, the VA announced that award would be made to the low bidder. HPC filed this protest with GAO, in essence arguing that the VA was correct in its initial determination that the low bid should be rejected for failing to include bid prices for both line items.

The VA countered HPC’s protest by arguing that failing to bid on the alternate line item did not render the low bid unresponsive, because the VA ultimately did not make an award on the alternate line item. GAO agreed with the VA, and denied HPC’s protest.

GAO stated that agencies must evaluate bids based on the work actually awarded. Basically this means that bidders do not always have to submit bid prices on every alternate line item in a solicitation to be considered for award. This is true even where a solicitation explicitly warns offerors that failing to bid on all items will cause rejection of a bid. A bid that does not submit a bid price on an alternate line item is only nonresponsive if the procuring agency’s evaluation and award includes the alternate item that was not bid.

Practically speaking, this decision introduces an interesting option for contractors when submitting bids on solicitations with varying alternate line items. If a solicitation contains an alternate line item that for one reason or another makes the project less desirable, the contractor could theoretically omit a bid price for the undesirable alternate item and remain responsive to the line items it was actually pursuing. This case makes it clear that as long as it submits a bid price on the line item actually awarded, the agency has to consider it for award.

Share

Related Posts

5 Must-Know Tips for Preparing a Bid: Addressing the Key Points in Your Proposal to The Government

March 9, 2018

Five Factors for Proposal Evaluation – Creating Bids that Will Survive a Protest

March 9, 2018

Competitive Range – Matter of: Pinnacle Solutions, Inc.

August 25, 2017

Agencies Must Provide an Accurate Estimate of Requirements in a Solicitation

May 29, 2014

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Download our Bid Protest Primer FREE eBook!

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Fair Market Price
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Preaward/Postaward Requirements
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposals
  • Protest Jurisdiction
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Uncategorized
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Visit Our
blog

Read more

Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-202-770-2939
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

Lists*

© 2018 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-202-770-2939