• LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411

Bid Protest Weekly
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • What is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • Why Should you file a bid protest?
    • When Must you file a bid protest?
    • Where can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Asiel Enterprises, Inc., B-406780, B-406836, August 28, 2012

  • By GCPC GovCon Legal Team
  • September 5, 2012
  • Non-Procurement InstrumentsRestricted Competition

Link: GAO Decision

Protestor: Asiel Enterprises, Inc.

Agency: Department of the Air Force

Disposition: Protest Sustained.

_________________________________________________________________________

GAO Digest:

Protest challenging Air Force’s use of a Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality (NAFI) to provide mission essential food services is sustained where the Air Force transferred the mission essential food service requirements to the NAFI on a noncompetitive basis and failed to otherwise justify the NAFI’s provision of this requirement on a sole-source basis; 10 U.S.C. § 2492 (2006) does not provide authority for the Air Force to transfer the provision of mission essential food service requirements to a NAFI.

General Counsel PC Highlight:

Asiel Enterprises, Inc. protested the agency’s decision to acquire essential messing services at the Barksdale and Dyess AFBs from the Air Force Mission Essential Feeding Fund (AFMEFF), an Air Force Supplemental Mission Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality (NAFI), on a sole-source basis, rather than holding a competition. Under the Food Transformation Initiative (FTI), the agency combined mission-essential food services (food services provided at Air Force dining facilities to airmen) and non-essential food services (restaurants, snack bars, limited menu operations, etc) provided within the Morale, Welfare, and Recreation (MWR) system. Under FTI, appropriated funds are transferred from Air Force installations to the AFMEFF, which provides the installations’ mission-essential services using “pre-qualified” contractors.

In August 2009, under this new initiative, the Air Force Nonappropriated Fund Purchasing Office (AFNAFPO), within the Air Force Services Agency (AFSVA), posted a notice instructing interested sources to respond to a Qualifications Survey, provided past performance information, corporate/operating structure, and financial strength and capabilities. After pre-qualifying, Aramark and Sodexo entered into Nonappropriated Purchasing Agreements (NPAs) with the AFNAFPO. The NPAs specifically envisioned a nonappropriated fund (NAF) contractor approach which combines NAF and appropriated fund resources to provide mission and NAF resale feeding capabilities in NAF food operations.

In November 2010, the AMFEFF and the AFSVA entered into an NAFI MOA to provide appropriated funds in exchange for the operation of mission essential dining services. The MOA incorporated the first portfolio of bases under FTI, which had been awarded to Aramark. The AFSVA then entered into Installation Operating Agreements (IOAs) with a second portfolio of bases, including Barksdale and Dyess. Asiel, who was the incumbent provider of mission essential food services at Barksdale and Dyess, was contacted by Aramark, which stated that it was responding to an RFQ from the AFSVA to provide food services at Barksdale. Asiel contacted contracting officials at both Barksdale and Dyess regarding the RFQ, in addition to filing FOIA requests, but had not received any responses at the time of protest.

The GAO disagreed with the agency’s assertion that it has special authority under 10 U.S.C. § 2492 to obtain the mission essential food services in question from the AFMEFF through a MOA, and that, as a consequence, CICA was inapplicable. The GAO noted that section 2492 limits such agreements to those in support of the MWR system, not mission essential food services. The GAO did not find reasonable the agency’s reading of section 2492 as authorizing the AFMEFF, a NAFI, to provide mission essential services to the Air Force because it is of benefit to the MWR system for the agency to acquire both operation of essential food service facilities and operation of non-essential food service facilities (such as officers’ clubs) from the same contractor. Without authority under section 2492, the Air Force could not have transferred appropriated funds to the NAFI for the provision of mission essential food services without undertaking a competitive procurement process.

Although the GAO will generally not review protests of the award of agreements other than procurement contracts pursuant to its bid protest jurisdiction under CICA, it will consider timely protests that an agency has used a non-procurement instrument, such as the MOA in this protest, where a procurement contract was required. If a company is excluded from the ability to compete for or otherwise receive an award of a non-procurement instrument, they may have grounds to protest to the GAO should they believe that the agency used an improper instrument. The GAO will exercise jurisdiction to ensure that the agency is not attempting to avoid the requirements of procurement statutes and regulations.

Share

Related Posts

Unitron LP, B-406770, August 14, 2012

October 3, 2012

Assisted Housing Services Corporation; North Tampa Housing Development Corporation; The Jefferson County Assisted Housing Corporation; National Housing Compliance; Southwest Housing Compliance Corporation; CMS Contract Management Services and the Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton; Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, B-406738,B-406738.2,B-406738.3,B-406738.4,B-406738.5,B-406738.6,B-406738.7,B-406738.8, August 15, 2012

August 22, 2012

Maersk Line, Limited, B-406586, B-406586.2, June 29, 2012

July 18, 2012

J&J Maintenance, Inc., B-405310, October 17, 2011

December 7, 2011

Comments are closed

Search Bid Protest Weekly

Need help with a bid protest?

Call us at: 703-556-0411 Or fill out this form:

Categories

  • 8(a) Sole Source Awards
  • Acknowledging Amendments
  • Adequately Written Proposal
  • Adverse Agency Action
  • Adverse Impact Analysis
  • Agency Tender
  • Alternate or Previously-Approved Product
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Ambiguity in Solicitation
  • Attorney's Fees
  • Bad Faith in Evaluation
  • Below-Cost Offer
  • Best Value
  • Beyond the Scope
  • Bias
  • Bid and Proposal Costs
  • Bid Bond
  • Bid Compliance
  • Bid Protest Decisions
  • Bid Protest Jurisdiction
  • Bid Protests
  • Bidding Best Practices
  • Blanket Purchase Agreement
  • Blanket Purchase Order
  • Blog Articles
  • Bona Fide Needs Rule
  • Brand Name or Equal
  • Broad Agency Announcement
  • Brooks Act
  • Bundling or Consolidation
  • Buy American Act
  • Cancellation of a Solicitation
  • Capability of Contractor
  • CCR Registration
  • Certificate of Competency (COC)
  • Certification Requirements
  • Changes Clause
  • Clarifications
  • Clear and Convincing Evidence
  • Clearly Meritorious Protest
  • Clerical Error
  • Commercial Item Acquisition
  • Competitive Range
  • Compliance
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Construction Design-Build
  • Construction Services
  • Contract Administration
  • Contract Modifications
  • Contracting Preference
  • Contractor Responsibility
  • Corporate Capability
  • Corrective Action
  • Cost Accounting System
  • Cost Evaluation
  • Cost Realism
  • Cost Reimbursement Contract
  • Cost-Technical Trade-Off
  • Customary Commercial Practice
  • CVE
  • DCAA Audit
  • Debriefing
  • Default Termination
  • Deficient Price Proposal
  • Delivery Order jurisdiction
  • Delivery Schedule
  • Designated Employee Agent
  • Disclosure of Price
  • Disclosure of Source Selection-Sensitive Information
  • Discussions
  • Disqualification
  • Documentation of Evaluation
  • Domestic Production Requirement
  • Education Center Articles
  • Electronic Filing
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluations
  • Events
  • Executive Order Compliance
  • Experience of Contractor
  • Experience Requirement
  • Facility Clearance
  • Fair Market Price
  • FASA
  • FedBizOpps
  • Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
  • Filing Deadlines
  • Final Evaluation
  • Final Proposal Revisions
  • Financial Responsibility
  • Fixed Price Contract
  • Former Government Employees
  • FSS Contract
  • GAO Bid Protest Review
  • GAO Jurisdiction
  • GAO Standard of Review
  • Government Contracts
  • Government Office Closings
  • Government Surplus Material
  • GSA Lease
  • HUBZone
  • ID/IQ
  • Impaired Objectivity
  • In-Sourcing
  • Incentive Fee
  • Inclement Weather Delay
  • Incomplete Proposal
  • Incorporation by Reference
  • Incumbent Capture
  • Incumbent Status
  • Independent Government Estimate (IGE)
  • Individual Environmental Report
  • Industrial Mobilization
  • Innovations
  • Interested Party
  • Invitation for Bid
  • Invited Contractor
  • Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
  • Joint Venture
  • Key Personnel
  • Labor Hours
  • Labor Rate Pricing
  • Late Proposals
  • Late Submissions
  • Level of Effort
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Limitation on Subcontracting
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Lost Proposal
  • Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
  • Mail-Box Rule
  • Management Planning
  • Market Research
  • MAS Contracts
  • Material Misrepresentation
  • Material Solicitation Amendment
  • Material Solicitation Terms
  • Meaningful Discussions
  • Micro-Purchase Threshold
  • Minimum Requirements
  • Misleading Discussions
  • Mistake
  • Mitigation Strategy
  • Multiple Awards
  • NAICS Code
  • National Security
  • Negotiation
  • News
  • Non-Procurement Instruments
  • Novations
  • Offeror Representations
  • OMB Circular A-76
  • Option Exercise
  • Oral Presentations
  • Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)
  • Page Limitations
  • Past Performance
  • Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)
  • Performance Based Standards
  • Permits and Responsibilities
  • Personal Conflicts of Interest
  • Post-Award Changes to the Contract
  • Post-Protest Re-Evaluations
  • Practicable Alternative
  • Pre-Award Protest
  • Pre-award vs. Post-award Requirements
  • Pre-Qualification of Offerors
  • Pre-Solicitation Notice
  • Prejudice
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Calculation Error
  • Price Evaluation
  • Price of FSS Task Order Quote
  • Price Realism
  • Price Reasonableness
  • Price Reduction
  • Procurement Announcement
  • Procurement Integrity
  • Product Testing
  • Proposal Acceptance Period
  • Proposal Detail
  • Proposal Evaluation
  • Proposal Extension
  • Proposal Standards
  • Proposals
  • Protest Terms of Solicitation
  • Protester Comments
  • Public-Private Competition
  • Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA)
  • Rate Tenders
  • Re-Certification of Size Status
  • Reconsideration
  • Reevaluation
  • Reevaluation Standards
  • Reimbursed Attorney's Fees
  • Reimbursement of Protest Costs
  • Rejection of Proposal
  • Relaxation or Waiver of Requirement
  • Relevancy of Past Performance
  • Reliance on the Proposal
  • Remedies
  • Requirements Contract
  • Responsibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Restricted Competition
  • Resumes
  • Revision of Proposal
  • Revision of Proposals
  • Risk
  • Rule of Two
  • SBA Status protest
  • Scope of GAO Review
  • SDVOSB Set-Asides
  • Significant Issue Exception
  • Simplified Acquisition Procedures
  • Site Visit
  • Size Determination
  • Size Protest
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program
  • Small Business Set-Asides
  • Small Business Subcontracting Goals
  • Sole-Source Award
  • Solicitation Amendment
  • Solicitation Requirements
  • Source Approval
  • Source Selection Authority
  • Source Selection Decision
  • Source Selection Plan
  • Sources Sought Notice
  • Staffing Plan
  • State and Local Requirements
  • Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)
  • Subcontract Protest
  • Subcontractor Experience
  • Suspension and Debarment
  • Taking Exception to RFP Requirements
  • Task Orders
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Technical Acceptability
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Technical Evaluation
  • Termination of Award
  • Terms of the Solicitation
  • Timeliness of Protest
  • Timely Filing
  • Timely Performance
  • Timely Proposal Submission
  • Trade Agreement Act
  • Unbalanced Pricing
  • Unduly Restrictive Terms
  • Unequal Access to Information
  • Unequal Treatment of Offerors
  • Uniform Time Act of 1996
  • Unstated Evaluation Criteria
  • Unusual and Compelling Urgency
  • Use of Appropriated Funds
  • Veterans First
  • VIP Database
  • VOSB Set Asides
  • Wage Determination

Get Help


Talk to an
attorney who
specializes
in bid protests:

+1-703-556-0411
Email

Keep up to date
on bid protest
decisions and
policies:

© 2023 Bid Protest Weekly

  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Bid Protest Ed Center
    • What is a bid protest?
    • WHO can file a bid protest
    • DO I need an Attorney?
    • Why Should you file a bid protest?
    • When Must you file a bid protest?
    • Where can you file a bid protest?
    • READING the RFP
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

+1-703-556-0411